Loading...

Determining Cluster Count Hyper Parameter for Unsupervised Learning KMEAN Models


Determining Cluster Counts with Elbow Method
Determining the optimal number of clusters in unsupervised machine learning, particularly for the KMeans algorithm, is a crucial step that significantly influences the algorithm's effectiveness and the meaningfulness of its results. KMeans works by partitioning data into clusters based on feature similarity, with the goal of minimizing variance within each cluster while maximizing variance between clusters. However, the algorithm requires the number of clusters to be specified a priori, and this is not always straightforward. Choosing too few clusters can lead to oversimplification, where distinct groups are improperly merged, while too many clusters might overfit the data, capturing noise and anomalies as separate groups. An optimal cluster count strikes a balance, ensuring that the model accurately captures the inherent structure of the data without overcomplicating it. This is essential for actionable insights and effective decision-making in various applications like market segmentation, anomaly detection, or organizing large data sets into understandable groups. Therefore, techniques like the elbow method (shown below), silhouette analysis, or the Davies–Bouldin index are often employed to estimate the most suitable number of clusters, enhancing the practical utility and interpretability of KMeans models.

Code
We stage proprietary crypto metrics accessible by Plus+ members (not shown) and then scale the data to be in a range of 0 or 1. KMEANs unsupervised learning uses numeric data to make unseen associations. If values are drastically different, it will negatively influence the algorithm. It is important to scale all of the data before running this clustering. Once scaling is done, the algorithm is run for increasing number of cluster counts. The average distance between the cluster and the data is called the inertia, and we run the algorithm for several cluster counts. The elbow graph is created in order to visualize where we see the rate of decrease in cluster counts decline significantly. The decline in the WCSS vs the cluster count indicates where increasing the number of clusters loses most predictive effect. Choose the cluster where the data seems to indicate that there is no more reduction in WCSS to cluster addition. Using the below elbow graph, we would choose 4 clusters. (Although choosing 5 or 6 clusters would also be reasonable based on the results).








Notice: Information contained herein is not and should not be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy or sell securities. The information has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable; however no guarantee is made or implied with respect to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness. Author does not own the any crypto currency discussed. The information and content are subject to change without notice. CryptoDataDownload and its affiliates do not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice.

This material has been prepared for informational purposes only and is the opinion of the author, and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, investment, tax, legal, accounting advice. You should consult your own investment, tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any transaction. All content published by CryptoDataDownload is not an endorsement whatsoever. CryptoDataDownload was not compensated to submit this article. Please also visit our Privacy policy; disclaimer; and terms and conditions page for further information.

THE PERFORMANCE OF TRADING SYSTEMS IS BASED ON THE USE OF COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM LOGIC. IT IS HYPOTHETICAL. PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING DISCLAIMER. CFTC RULE 4.41: HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER-OR-OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFIT OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. U.S. GOVERNMENT REQUIRED DISCLAIMER: COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. FUTURES AND OPTIONS TRADING HAS LARGE POTENTIAL REWARDS, BUT ALSO LARGE POTENTIAL RISK. YOU MUST BE AWARE OF THE RISKS AND BE WILLING TO ACCEPT THEM IN ORDER TO INVEST IN THE FUTURES AND OPTIONS MARKETS. DON’T TRADE WITH MONEY YOU CAN’T AFFORD TO LOSE. THIS IS NEITHER A SOLICITATION NOR AN OFFER TO BUY/SELL FUTURES OR OPTIONS. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE DISCUSSED ON THIS WEBSITE. THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF ANY TRADING SYSTEM OR METHODOLOGY IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Latest Posts
Follow Us
Notify me of new content